The PIL was disposed of on the ground that the petitioner did not contest the general ward election of the third respondent, rendering the petition non-maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-1368.17.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1368 OF 2017
Irfan Mehboob Shaikh … Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Shrishail Sakhare for the Petitioner. Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Deendayal G. Dhanure for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2018
P.C.
1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that
the petitioner did not contest the general ward election of the third respondent.
2 Hence, this Petition does not survive and the same is
disposed of.
1 of 1
Irfan Mehboob Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
A.S. OKA
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
