Writ petition dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner at the hearing listed on January 15, 2018. The court recorded the absence and proceeded to dismiss the petition.
Dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 359-14.doc
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 359 OF 2014
Sushma Digambar Lokegaonkar … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Anant Vadgaonka, for the Respondent - BMC.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 15, 2018 PC :
. When this petition (listed high upon the board) is called
out at 11.00 a.m., none appeared for the Petitioner. Even when the
petition was called at 11.30 a.m., none appeared for the Petitioner. Hence, we dismiss the petition for non prosecution.
Sd/Sd/[P. N. DESHMUKH, J.] [A. S. OKA, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Sushma Digambar Lokegaonkar
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Oka
P. N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
