In a writ petition regarding the petitioner's date of appointment, the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad directed the respondent to decide on the petitioner's proposal within six months and disposed of the matter without costs.
The respondent shall take a decision on the petitioner's proposal preferably within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) wp4425.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4425 OF 2014
MADHUKAR DAULATRAO WAVALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Mr.B.N.Patil, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.S.K.Tambe, AGP for the respondent/State
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :28.08.2018
P.C. :-
.Mr. Patil, learned counsel submits that
considering that the petitioner had been brought on
CRTE from 1984, treating the petitioner fresh
employee as appointed in the year 1992, is
erroneous. Learned counsel submits that the
Government Labour Officer, Parbhani has submitted
the proposal to respondent No.3 to consider the case
of the petitioner from the initial date of
appointment. No decision has been taken by the
respondent on it as yet.
2.We have heard learned AGP.
3.In case the proposal submitted by the
Government Labour Officer, Parbhani (Exh.F) is
pending with respondent No.3, then respondent No.3
shall take decision on it, in accordance with law,
preferably within six months.
4.The writ petition accordingly stands
disposed of. No costs.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J.]
VishalK/ wp4425.14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent shall decide on the proposal for treating the petitioner as an employee from the initial date of appointment within the stipulated time.
Madhukar Daulatrao Wavale
The State of Maharashtra and Ors
S.V. Gangapurwala
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court