Disposed

Avinash Balaji Ghodke v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC24 Jan 2018WP/1006/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Regional Deputy Commissioner to decide on the petitioner's pending appointment proposal as a Laboratory Assistant within eight weeks or grant a hearing, and ordered payment of arrears if appointed, without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide appointment within 8 weeks or grant hearing; payment of arrears if appointed.

Avinash Balaji Ghodke Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp1006.18

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.1006 OF 2018

¶6

Avinash Balaji Ghodke,
Age-25 years, Occu:Service as
Laboratory Assistant,
R/o-Lohata, Tq-Ausa,
Dist-Latur.

¶7

...PETITIONER
 VERSUS

¶8

1) The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32,

¶9

2) The Regional Deputy Commissioner, Social Welfare, Latur Region, Latur, Dist-Latur,

¶10

3) The Assistant Commissioner, Social Welfare, Osmanabad, Dist-Osmanabad,

¶11

4) Sneh Gramvikas Sanstha,

¶12

Devtala, Tq-Ausa, Dist-Latur, Through its Secreatry,

¶13

5) Vidya Niketan Secsondary Ashram School Shingoli, Tq. & Dist-Osmanabad, Through its Headmaster.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

wp1006.18

¶16

¶17

...

¶18

 Mr.Anand V. Indrale Patil Advocate for
 Petitioner.

¶19

 Mr.S.B. Yawalkar, Additional Government
 Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.

¶20

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
 S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.

¶21

 DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2018

¶22

ORDER :

¶23

1.In this Petition the grievance is raised
that though the proposal in respect of approval to

¶24

the appointment of the Petitioner as Laboratory
Assistant is pending with Respondent No.2, no
final decision is yet taken.

¶25

2.We direct Respondent No.2 to take

¶26

decision on the proposal in respect of approval to
the appointment of the Petitioner as Laboratory
Assistant, if already not taken, as expeditiously

¶27

as possible, however within EIGHT WEEKS from

¶28

today, on its own merits.

¶29

wp1006.18

¶30

¶31

3.If Respondent No.2 wishes to hear the

¶32

Petitioner, he can do so by issuing notice to the
Petitioner and calling him for hearing.

¶33

4.We make clear that we have not expressed

¶34

any opinion on the merits of the contentions
raised in the Petition.

¶35

5.Needless to observe that if approval is

¶36

granted to the appointment of the Petitioner on
the post of Laboratory Assistant, the Respondents
shall take necessary further steps to pay arrears
of salary etc. to the Petitioner.

¶37

directions the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶38

[S.M. GAVHANE, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]

¶39

asb/JAN18

Avinash Balaji Ghodke v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avinash Balaji Ghodke v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devendra Tukaram Katke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sanjay Madhukar Kale and Others Vs Anuja Kalyan Gore and Others

Shri Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha Kolhapur through the Secretary and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

World All Sports Games through Its Secretary Lovekumar Kaduba Jadhav Vs the General Secretary Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs Government of India New Delhi and Anothe

Dudhate Mandap Decoration through Its Proprietor S M Dudhate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shivraj Kankayya Nagalu Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others