This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4148-18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4148 OF 2018
Indrajit s/o Mukundrao Nile
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. R.V Gore, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondents. Mr. G.J. Pahilwan, advocate holding for Mr. S.A. Ambad, advocate for respondent no. 5.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 24th APRIL, 2018
PER COURT:
In exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for in the instant petition. Petition is devoid of substance hence stands rejected.
K. K. SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Indrajit s/o Mukundrao Nile
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
