A threshold order disposing of a writ petition by treating the grievance as non-resintegrta by reference to a companion matter decided on 6.3.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
57 WRIT PETITION NO. 213 OF 2018 WITH CA/2161/2018 IN WP/213/2018
MANISHA RAMKISAN THOMBRE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.B. Dhakane AGP for Respondents:Mr. P.N. Kutti Advocate for Respondents :Mr. A.N. Nagargoje
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. Date: April 23, 2018
PER COURT :-
1 The grievance raised in the instant petition is no more resintegra and is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No.209/2018 and other companion matters decided on 6.3.2018.
2 The writ petition, as such stands disposed of in terms of the order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.
( K. K. SONAWANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No. 209/2018Followed¶1
Manisha Ramkisan Thombre
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
