Disposed
Maroti Sukhdev Andhale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCCP/104/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp104-18.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 104 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1480 OF 2016
Maroti s/o Sukhdev Andhale
& others
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. V.P. Savant, advocate for petitioners. Mr. S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 24th APRIL, 2018
PER COURT:
2 In affidavit in reply presented by Mr. Devender Singh, Collector, Beed on 28.03.2018, a statement is made that compensation amount will be paid within three months from today.
3 In view of the statement made as above, contempt petition stands disposed of.
K. K. SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Maroti s/o Sukhdev Andhale
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court