The High Court partly allowed the writ petition, directing respondents to stop using the present structure in a reserved forest after 31/08/2018 based on an affidavit regarding alternate premises.
Direction to respondents to stop using the present structure in the reserved forest after 31/08/2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2802wp3960.06.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3960/2006
Nature Conservation Society, Amravati through its Member Shri Kishor s/o Dnyaneshwar Rithe
...Versus...
The State of Maharashtra, Through Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 032 and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri P.S. Chawhan, Counsel for petitioner Shri N.S. Rao, AGP for respondent nos.1, 3 and 6 to 28 Shri K.N. Shukul, Counsel for respondent nos.2, 4 & 5
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ. DATE : 28/02/2018
JUDGE JUDGE
Wadkar
Nature Conservation Society, Amravati through its Member Shri Kishor s/o Dnyaneshwar Rithe
The State of Maharashtra, Through Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 032 and others
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
ARUN D. UPADHYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
