THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2802pil5.18 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.5 OF 2018
(Maharashtra Veej Grahak Sanghatana vs. State of Maharashtra and others)
______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri A.S. Kilor, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri S.A. Ashirgade, Additional Government Pleader for respondent no.1.
Shri Sunil Manohar, Senior Advocate with Shri Ashish Singh, Advocate and Shri R.R. Pimpulkhute, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Shri Rohan Chandurkar, Advocate for respondent no.3.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.D. UPADHYE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 28, 2018
Learned Senior Advocate Shri Manohar with Adv. Ashish Singh and Adv. R.R. Pimpulkhute for respondent no.2 states that the impugned Resolutions are being withdrawn within next three days and appropriate alternate arrangement is also being prescribed.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Maharashtra Veej Grahak Sanghatana
State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
A.D. Upadhye
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
