THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2802pil26.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.26 OF 2018
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 382/2018 IN P.I.L. NO.26/2018 (Nagari Hakka Saurakshan Manch vs. Union of India and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri A.R. Ingole, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri S.A. Ashirgade, Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.D. UPADHYE, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 28, 2018
Without observing anything on merits of controversy and keeping objections raised by learned Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos.3 and 4 open, we direct respondent no.2 to look into the representation submitted by the petitioner as per law within next four weeks.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Nagari Hakka Saurakshan Manch
Union of India
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
A.D. UPADHYE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
