Dismissed
Sayyed Kalim Sayyed Kondal v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCWP/3589/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
14 WRIT PETITION NO. 3589 OF 2018
SAYYED KALIM SAYYED KONDAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.N. Lale Yelwatkar AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.Y. Mahajan
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. Date: April 09, 2018
PER COURT :-
1 The matter was called out in the morning session. However, counsel appearing for the petitioner was absent. As such, the same was directed to be listed in the afternoon session. In the afternoon also, when the matter is called out, the counsel for the petitioner is absent.
2 In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( K. K. SONAWANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Sayed Kalim Sayyed Kondal
The State of Maharashtra
Another
R. M. Borde
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court