This court disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondent state to take a decision on a college proposal, allowing the petitioner six weeks to submit additional documents.
Terms of order to take decision within six weeks and to avail additional documents opportunity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
13 WRIT PETITION NO. 3588 OF 2018
SHUBHANGI DINESH RATHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.V. Deshmukh AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. Date: April 09, 2018
PER COURT :-
1 This petition can be disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to take decision on the proposal tendered by the College on 8.11.2017 in accordance with the decision rendered by this Court earlier in the similar matter and after extending opportunity to the petitioner to tender additional documents as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from today and it is accordingly directed.
( K. K. SONAWANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be disposed of by directing the respondent to take a decision on the college's proposal and extend opportunity to the petitioner to tender additional documents within six
Shubhangi Dinesh Rathi
The State of Maharashtra
Another
R. M. Borde
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
