The court disposed of the writ petition and a pending civil application, observing that the State Government may take appropriate decisions in accordance with Supreme Court decisions and state policy.
Disposed of; Civil Application disposed of
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
6 WRIT PETITION NO. 3434 OF 2018
SHARJABAI TUKARAM GAIKWAD AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.P. Brahme & Mr.P S. Pawar AGP for Respondents:Mr. S.Y. Mahajan
Advocate for Respondent No.5 :Mr. S.B. Pulkundewar
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. Date: April 09, 2018
PER COURT :-
1 In continuation of the decision recorded by this Court earlier, in PIL No.36/2017, it would be open for the State Government to take appropriate decision in the matter in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, as well as the Policy prescribed by the State in that behalf.
( K. K. SONAWANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
SHARJABAI TUKARAM GAIKWAD AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
K. K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
