This is not the first case of the nature like the one in hand. We are now regularly coming across such matters in review applications wherein a reference is made to the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, before which a statement is made by the counsel for the petitioners that a relevant submission, though was made before the High Court, is not considered. If such a statement is factually correct, we would be glad to redress the grievance of the concerned party, if made before us, at the time of rendering the judgment or the order or within a short time thereafter. We, however, find that the well accepted procedure that needs to be followed, as per the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, is not being followed and a statement is casually made before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by the parties approaching the Supreme Court that a particular submission that was made before the High Court is not incorporated in the order. We do not appreciate the conduct of such parties that indulge in making incorrect statements before the Superior Courts as the Superior Courts would not be in a position to gauge the correctness or otherwise of the statement. It is well settled that even if several grounds are raised in a petition and if some of them are not argued, the ones that are not argued are deemed to have been given up. It would be necessary to refer to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in (2008) 2 SCC 95 (Mohd. Akram Ansari Versus Chief Election Officer &
