This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Public Interest Litigation No. 121 of 2016 [Sham Meemraj Agrawal Vs. Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur, and three others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. G. N. Khanzode, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. J. B. Kasat, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Anil Mardikar, Sr. Adv., with Mr. S. G. Joshi, Adv., for respondent no.4.
Ms. Mugdha Chandurkar, Adv., for respondent no.5.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND ROHIT B. DEO, JJ.
DATE : 26th September, 2018
in the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.4, it is stated that the work of construction and renovation of the temple would be completed by the end of December, 2019.
The said statement is taken on record.
In view of the specific statement made by the respondent no.4, nothing survives in the present Public Interest Litigation. The same is, thus, disposed of.
Judge Judge
|hedau|
2
Sham Meemraj Agrawal
Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur
Respondent no.2
Respondent no.3
Respondent no.4
Respondent no.5
B. R. Gavai
Rohit B. Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
