Court dismissed writ petitions and additional writ withdrawn by consent of learned counsel.
Both Writ Petitions 2067 and 2203 of 2018 were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1&5-WP-2067&2203-18.doc
SharayuPandurangKhot
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2067 OF 2018
Landmark Constructions …Petitioner Versus
The Union of India & Ors. …Respondents
ALONG WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2203 OF 2018
Landmark Enterprises …Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Ms. Ankita Vashistha, i/b UBR Legal, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sham Walve a/w Ms. Sneha Prabhu, for the Respondents.
Digitally signedby SharayuPandurang KhotDate:2018.09.2718:47:48 +1200
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 26 September 2018
1 / 2
September 26, 2018
1&5-WP-2067&2203-18.doc
ORDER :
support of both the Petitions on instructions seeks to withdraw both these Petitions. The Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 / 2
September 26, 2018
Landmark Constructions
The Union of India
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
