The Bombay High Court dismissed the central excise appeal as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the appellant acting on instructions from the Commissioner of Central Tax Pune-I.
Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
46-CEXA-86-18.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2018
The Commissioner of Central Tax …Appellant
Versus
Preciforge & Gears (Division of Patodia …Respondent Forging & Gears Ltd.
Mr. M. Dwivedi a/w Mr. J.B. Mishra, for the Appellant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 26 September 2018
ORDER :
SharayuPandurangKhot Digitally signedby SharayuPandurang KhotDate:2018.09.2718:47:48 +1200
1944 challenges the order dated 14th December 2017 passed by
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
1 / 2
September 26, 2018
46-CEXA-86-18.doc
issued by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs directs the Revenue not to file fresh Appeals and also withdraw the pending Appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50.00 Lakhs.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
2 / 2 September 26, 2018
The Commissioner of Central Tax
Preciforge & Gears (Division of Patodia Forging & Gears Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
