Appeal filed by Customs Commissioner against Tribunal order under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn after Revenue acknowledged Central Board instruction not to pursue minor tax effect appeals.
Rule listed; Court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
45-CEXA-12-12.doc
Sharayu Khot .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Central Excise & …Appellant Customs
Versus
M/s. Rama Industries …Respondent
Mr. M. Dwivedi, for the Appellant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 26 September 2018
ORDER :
SharayuPandurangKhot Digitally signedby SharayuPandurang KhotDate:2018.09.2718:47:52 +1200
1944 challenges the order dated 27th April 2011 passed by
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
1 / 2
September 26, 2018
45-CEXA-12-12.doc
issued by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs directs the Revenue not to file fresh Appeals and also withdraw the pending Appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50.00 Lakhs.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 / 2
September 26, 2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s. Rama Industries
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
