The court disposed of multiple writ petitions as nothing survived following compliance with its earlier directions and changes in the government scheme.
All petitions were disposed of as nothing survives in these proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) WP No.2109/2013 & ors.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2109 OF 2013
Captain J.B. Deshmukh Charitable Trust, Latur. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
Respondents.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2113/2013
Ambika Bahuuddeshiya Mahila Mandal
Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2114 OF 2013
Krushnai Shikshan Prasark Mandal Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondents.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2115/2013
Sadnath Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents.
(2) WP No.2109/2013 & ors.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2118 OF 2013
Late Shri Rangnarao Deshmukh Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2122 OF 2013 Krushnai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2123 OF 2013. Shri Saibaba Sevabhavi Shikshan Sanstha. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2125 OF 2013 Sadnath Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2129 OF 2013 Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji Gramin Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Respondents.
(3) WP No.2109/2013 & ors.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2133 OF 2013
Shrushthi Bahuudeeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal.
Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondents.
Mr. G.V. Mohekar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.B. Dhage, Advocate for petitioner in WP No.2133/2013. Mr. R.V. Dasalkar, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.
Dated : 3rd March, 2018.
PER COURT :-
. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner for some time. Seen the order made by this Court in Writ Petition No.9860/2012 decided with group of petitions on 06.12.2012. In view of the specific directions given by this Court at para No.4 of the said decision, nothing survives in the present proceedings. Learned A.G.P. has also produced on record a new Scheme of the Government which could be found taken place in G.R. dated 14th July 2017. It is taken on record.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( T.V. NALAWADE) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
Captain J.B. Deshmukh Charitable Trust Latur
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
