Disposed
Rajkumar Bramhanand Pandarge v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/590/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 590 OF 2013
Rajkumar Brahmanand Pandarge. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
Respondents.
Mr. H.S. Bali, Advocate holding for Mr. S.R. Choukidar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, A.G.P. for State/respondent No.1. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.
Dated : 3rd March, 2018.
PER COURT :-
. Learned Counsel Mr. Bali holding for Mr. Choukidar,
learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement on instructions that the matter has become infructuous.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( T.V. NALAWADE) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
Rajkumar Brahmanand Pandarge
The State of Maharashtra
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court