This judgment is a single-paragraph order in a writ petition regarding Central Bank of India pension. Due to absence of the petitioner after notice, the High Court dismissed the petition without arguments, refusing to pass any interim or final order beyond what was submitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
5 WRIT PETITION NO. 2337 OF 2007 WITH CA/6196/2008 IN WP/2337/2007
SHANKARSINGH GANESHSINGH PARDESHI VERSUS
CHAIRPERSON AND MANAGING DIRECTOR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS
Shri. K.B. Deshpande, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Coram: T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
Date: 2 APRIL 2018
ORDER:
Nobody present for the petitioner. It was made clear that the matter will be dismissed if it is not argued. Seen the relief clause. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that final order on the basis of enquiry report is passed. In view of this statement, the writ petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. Civil Application is disposed of.
Sd/- Sd/- (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (T.V. NALAWADE, J.)
rsl
SHANKARSINGH GANESHSINGH PARDESHI
CHAIRPERSON AND MANAGING DIRECTOR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
