In a contempt petition regarding compliance of an earlier order, the court held that the order was complied with, the contempt was purged, and the petition was dismissed without costs.
Contempt petition disposed of; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
120 CONT. PETITION NO. 209 OF 2018
IN WP/6420/2016
JYOTI KISHOR PARDESHI
VERSUS
NANDKUMAR AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Dighe Vithal H.
Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Shelke Shivaji T.
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA
AND
SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 6, 2018
O R D E R :
The learned counsel for respondents submits that
the order of this court is complied.
2.The proposal seeking approval to the appointment
of the petitioner is rejected.Mr.Dighe,learned
counsel for the petitioner submits that without application
of mind the proposal has been rejected.
3.The merits of the order would not be a subject
matter of the Contempt Petition. If petitioner is
aggrieved with the order passed, the petitioner has remedy
available.
2 cp209.18
4. As the order is complied, the contempt stands
purged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. No costs.
[SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.]
mahajansb/
Jyoti Kishor Pardeshi
Nandkumar
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court