In a contempt petition, the High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of the matter as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request, without entering into the merits of the dispute regarding his employment status.
Contempt petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp 779.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 779 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3368 OF 2017
Kalidas Shivajirao Patil.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.. Respondents
Shri Ganesh A. Gadhe, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri P. S. Patil, Addl. G. P. for Respondent /
State.
Shri Baliram B. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent
No. 3.
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE: 7 th August, 2018
PER COURT :
1.Mr. Gadhe, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the Education officer has directed
the petitioner to officiate as an In-charge
Headmaster. The petitioner would withdraw the
contempt petition with liberty to agitate as and
when the approved body is in power.
2.Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 submits
that the petitioner is already terminated by the
2 cp 779.17
official body.
3.We need not enter into the said debate in the
present contempt petition. As the request is made
for withdrawal of the contempt petition, contempt
petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The parties
may take further steps as may be permissible in
law. Liberty is granted to the parties to take
further steps as may be permissible in law. No
costs.
[SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
Kalidas Shivajirao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court