Disposed

Ganeshrao Tukaramji Jare v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC24 Jul 2018WP/13776/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the writ petition and civil application noting the stay by the Hon'ble Minister on the disqualification order. The petitioner was directed to appear before the State Minister for Urban Development while the election proceedings were held subject to the Minister's ruling.

What did the court decide?

Disposed; petitioner directed to appear before the Hon'ble State Minister for Urban Development; elections subjected to Minister's result.

Ganeshrao Tukaramji Jare Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 13776 OF 2017

¶4

WITH

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9352 OF 2018

¶6

GANESHRAO TUKARAMJI JARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. G.N. Chincholkar. AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.R. Yadav.

¶8

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated : 24^th July, 2018

¶9

PER COURT :

¶10

This Court (Coram : V.K. Jadhav, J.) had heard the learned

¶11

counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGP on 27^th November, 2017 and had observed as under :

¶12

“1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, though the Collector Hingoli has disqualified the present respondent No.2, respondent No.2 has approached the Hon’ble Minister concerned by filing an appeal and the Hon’ble Minister has stayed the said order of disqualification till the further orders without specifying any date. Learned counsel for the petitioner/original complainant submits that even though, petitioner has approached the Hon’ble Minister, however, no next date in the matter has been given. Learned A.G.P. seeks two week’s time to take specific instructions in this regard.

¶13

2. Stand over to 11.12.2017.”

¶14

¶15

Thereafter, the record reveals that the matter was adjourned at the request of the petitioner on three occasions.

¶16

Learned AGP submits that the Hon'ble Minister would decide the pending proceedings within eight weeks from the date of appearance of the litigating sides.

¶17

Considering the above, this Writ Petition as well as the Civil Application stand disposed of. The petitioner shall appear before the Hon'ble State Minister for Urban Development in Appeal No. M.U.N. 4417/Pra/Kra 131/Navi 15, on 03^rd August, 2018, at 11.a.m. The office of the Hon'ble Minister would issue notices to the original appellant and respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4. After the service of notice is complete and after all the parties have appeared before the Hon'ble Minister, by the 31^st day of August, 2018, the Hon'ble Minister would proceed to consider their respective contentions.

¶18

These litigating sides would participate in the hearing on the dates on which the matter is posted. All the litigating sides are at liberty to enter their written notes of submission along with documents and citations. After concluding the hearing in the proceedings on/or before 30^th day of September, 2018, the Hon'ble Minister would proceed to deliver an order in the said appeal on/or before 31^st October, 2018. The litigating sides shall co-operate with the office of the Hon'ble Minister

¶19

¶20

for an expeditious hearing in the matter.

¶21

Needless to state, the elections that are scheduled on 24^th July, 2018, shall be subjected to the result of the proceedings before the Hon'ble Minister.

¶22

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

¶23

S.P.C.

Ganeshrao Tukaramji Jare v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganeshrao Tukaramji Jare v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivdas Santram Gavhane Vs Ravindra Sudhakar Ghadge

Pratibha Omprakash Kangulwar and Others Vs the Additional Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad and Others

Shivraj Kashinath Bhalerao Vs Alka Gajanan Anerao and Others

Udhalsingh Dhansingh Golwal and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shri Samarth Vidya Prasarak Mandal through Its President D R Kulkarni and Another Vs Sudhakar Pralhad Kulkarni and Another

Haridas Siddhu Tipare and Others Vs Janabai Babasaheb Tikure and Others