This court rejected a civil revision appealing an order declaring an application for rejection of plaint as infructuous after the plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the specific claims regarding court fee deposit.
The civil revision application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.79 OF 2018 (Shivraj s/o Kashinath Bhalerao Vs. Alka w/o Gajanan Anerao and others)
Mr.P.N.Kalani, Advocate for the applicant.
( CORAM : Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.)
DATE : 23/07/2018
PER COURT :
khs/JULY 2018/79-d
2
would not be pressed with reference to the said two claims. Consequentially, the grievance of the defendant No.2 was rendered infructuous. The Trial Court has rejected Exh.19 concluding that it has become infructuous.
khs/JULY 2018/79-d
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC becomes infructuous after the plaintiff voluntarily deletes the claims for want of court fees.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivraj s/o Kashinath Bhalerao
Alka w/o Gajanan Anerao and others
Ravindra V Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
