The High Court admitted and withdrawn the writ petition by treating the petitioner as having withdrawn it without merits consideration.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition admitted withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 136 OF 2017
Zainab Ismail Shete and Others. Versus Roha Municipal Council and Others.
..Petitioners.
..Respondents.
Mr. Keshav Borhade i/b Shelke & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Nitin Gangal for Respondent No. 1.
Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : April 18, 2018 .
P. C. :
[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Zainab Ismail Shete and Others
Roha Municipal Council
Ranjit More
S. S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
