The High Court at Bombay granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, noting that neither merits nor maintainability were examined.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mhi
WP-3486-17.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3486 OF 2017
Airports Authority of India Versus
Petitioner
M/s. Reliance Electronics & Anr. Respondents
Mr.M.P.S.Rao, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. S.P.Shetty & Mr. Arsh Mishra i/b. M.V.Kini & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr.Sunny Shah a/w Mr. Hemant Sethi i/b. Mr. Hemant Sethi & Co.for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,JJ. DATE :17th April, 2018.
P.C. :
Mr. Rao, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, after
arguing for some time and having taken instructions from his client,
seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to avail alternate
remedy. Leave with liberty as prayed for is granted. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
open.
Mhi
WP-3486-17.doc
2
relief, if any, stands vacated.
[SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE,J.]
Airports Authority of India
M/s. Reliance Electronics & Anr
Ranjit More
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
