COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; the petition is dismissed as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 289 OF 2009
Siddheshwar M. Kamurthi. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Another. ..Respondents.
Mr. R. P. Sabban for the Petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : April 18, 2018 .
P. C. :
1 / 2
patilsr
order dated 4th August 2011 with permission to make fresh representation before the Revenue Minister. Accordingly, Mr. Jain has made a representation to the Minister, which is still pending for final disposal.
[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
2 / 2
patilsr
Siddheshwar M. Kamurthi
State of Maharashtra
Another
Ranjit More
S. S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
