Allowed

M/S. Accordd Organics Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC8 Mar 2018WP/1285/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions by relying on its prior judgment in M/s. Arss Biofuel Pvt. Ltd. The court struck down specific rules of the Bombay Denatured Spirit Act, declared that no license is required for denatured spirit under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for industrial use, and clarified the state's limited power regarding rectified spirit diversion.

What did the court decide?

Bombay Denatured Spirit Rules, 1959 (Rules 23 to 62) struck down; no licence required under Maharashtra Prohibition Act for denatured spirit; State power clarified regarding rectified spirit.

M/S. Accordd Organics Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Ors. — Bombay HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

939.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

(PRODUCTION BOARD DATED 07/03/2018)

¶4

Writ Petition NO. 1057 OF 2006

¶5

M/s.jubilant Organosys Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ...Respondent(s)

¶6

WITH

¶7

Writ Petition NO. 1285 OF 2016

¶8

M/s. Accordd Organics Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶9

The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Ors ...Respondent(s)

¶10

WITH

¶11

Writ Petition NO. 2307 OF 2004

¶12

M/s.arss Biofuel Private Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondent(s)

¶13

WITH

¶14

Writ Petition NO. 2524 OF 2013

¶15

M/s. Abhijeet Chemicals Private Limited ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶16

State Of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Home (state Excise) And Ors ...Respondent(s)

¶17

WITH

¶18

Writ Petition NO. 2680 OF 2012

M/s. Laxmi Petrochem

...Petitioner(s)

1/6

nilegaonkar

939.doc

Versus State Of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Govt Of Maha, Home (transport) Dept And Ors ...Respondent(s)

¶25

...Respondent(s)

¶26

WITH Writ Petition NO. 2784 OF 2013

¶27

Ceraflux India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Home (state Excise) Dept And Ors ...Respondent(s)

¶28

WITH

¶29

Writ Petition NO. 3976 OF 2016

¶30

M/s. Industrial Solvent And Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Anr. ...Respondent(s)

¶31

WITH

¶32

Writ Petition NO. 4408 OF 2016

¶33

Alkyl Amines Chemicals Ltd ...Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Ors ...Respondent(s)

¶34

WITH

¶35

Writ Petition NO. 4958 OF 2010

¶36

M/s Jubilant Organosys Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Maharashtra And Ors ...Respondent(s)

2/6

nilegaonkar

939.doc

WITH Writ Petition NO. 4981 OF 2014

¶41

Mohommed Farhan Mohammed Yunus Attarwala ...Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Home (state Excise) Dept And Anr ...Respondent(s)

¶42

WITH Writ Petition NO. 4988 OF 2006

¶43

M/s.chloritech Industries ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶44

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondent(s)

¶45

WITH Writ Petition NO. 6305 OF 2015

¶46

M/s. Sterling Chemicals And Alcohols Private Limited ...Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Ors ...Respondent(s)

¶47

WITH Writ Petition NO. 6607 OF 2011

¶48

Provik Industries ...Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Maharashtra And Ors ...Respondent(s)

¶49

WITH Writ Petition NO. 6726 OF 2015

¶50

Mrs. Indra S. Jain ...Petitioner(s)

3/6

nilegaonkar

939.doc

Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Ors. ...Respondent(s)

¶55

WITH

¶56

Writ Petition NO. 7864 OF 2013

¶57

Mrs. Diya Dipesh Doshi, Prop. M/s. Prisha Chem ...Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Home (state Excise) Dept And Ors ...Respondent(s)

¶58

WITH Writ Petition NO. 9158 OF 2014

¶59

The Best Workers Union ...Petitioner(s) Versus The Best Undertaking And Anr ...Respondent(s)

¶60

WITH Writ Petition NO. 10401 OF 2015

¶61

M/s. Jubilant Life Sciences Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶62

The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Gov.of Maha.,home (state Excise) Dept. And Ors

¶63

...Respondent(s)

¶64

WITH Writ Petition NO. 10403 OF 2015

¶65

Oaisis Alcohol Ltd ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶66

The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal

4/6

nilegaonkar

939.doc

Secretary And Ors

...Respondent(s)

WITH Writ Petition NO. 11716 OF 2015

¶73

Alkoplus Producers Pvt. Ltd.

¶74

...Petitioner(s)

¶75

Versus

¶76

The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, (state Excise) And Ors. ...Respondent(s)

¶77

...Respondent(s)

¶78

Mr. D.B. Sawant for the Petitioners.

¶79

Mr.C.P. Yaddav, AGP for the Respondents-State.

¶80

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 08, 2018

¶81

P.C.:

¶82

. Parties through their counsel.

¶83

It is not in dispute that the question involved in these Petitions is covered by the Judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in various Writ Petitions including Writ Petition No.

¶84

8548 of 2004 in the case of M/s. Arss Biofuel Pvt. Ltd. vs.

¶85

State of Maharashtra and Ors. decided on 13th December,

¶86

2017.

¶87

In the circumstances, for the reasons stated in the judgment passed in the case of M/s. Arss Biofuel Pvt. Ltd. (supra)

¶88

these Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the order which

5/6

nilegaonkar

939.doc

reads thus :

“(a) The Bombay Denatured Spirit Rules, 1959 to the extent that they regulate the possession, use, sale, import, export and transport of denatured spirit viz. Rules 23 to 62 are ultra vires and unconstitutional and are struck down. (b) There shall be no licence required under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for sale, purchase, transport, possession, storage, dehydration, import and export of denatured spirit.

¶94

(c) We hereby clarify that the power of the State Government in the case of rectified spirit supplied for industrial purposes is only to see and ensure that rectified spirit, whether in the course of its manufacture or after its manufacture, is not diverted or misused for potable purpose. The State can make necessary regulations requiring the industry to submit periodical statements of raw material and the finished product (rectified spirits) and is entitled to verify their correctness.

¶95

(d) The Writ Petitions are made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs.”

¶96

Rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms.

¶97

(M.S. KARNIK, J.)

¶98

(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

¶99

6/6

¶100

nilegaonkar

M/S. Accordd Organics Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Accordd Organics Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tushar Guru Salien Vs State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors. and Bharat Momle and Anr. (Contemnors)

Crop Care Federation of India Vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Bharati Manohar Solanki Vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Vinay Pandurang Rangsur Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, and Ors.

M/S.Jubilant Organosys Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Industrial Solvent and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Anr.