The petitioner in this PIL noted that the underlying grievance no longer subsisted. The court, upon reconsideration, disposed of the petition by discharging the rule.
Rule discharged and petition disposed of on the ground that the grievance no longer subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
211-PIL-183-07.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.183 OF 2007
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.60 OF 2009
Surendrasingh Mohansingh Parmar vs.
The Union Territory of Dadra Nagar Haveli & Ors.
..Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr. Prakash Mahadik for the Petitioner. Ms.Priyanka Pol i/b Little & Co. for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7, 9 & 10.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 11th JANUARY, 2018
P.C.:
. At 3.00 p.m., the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner has requested to recall the order passed in the morning session. He has placed on record a print-out of an e-mail received from the Petitioner which is taken on record and marked “X-2” for identification. It mentions that the grievance in the petition no longer subsists. In view of what is mentioned in the order passed in the morning session and in the light of notification marked 'X-1' for identification, the Petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged.
(P.N. DESHMUKH, J)
(A.S. OKA, J.)
Surendrasingh Mohansingh Parmar
The Union Territory of Dadra Nagar Haveli
A.S. OKA
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
