Petitioner sought leave to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No.5 of 2018. Court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
9-PIL-5-2018.doc
Sudhir Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.5 OF 2018
Aniket Satish Amberkar … Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents.
Mr. Sandeep Bane i/b. Roshan Kamble for the Petitioner. Mr. C.P. Yadav, AGP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
R.G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2018
PER COURT :
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Leave granted. The Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( R.G. KETKAR ) ( R.M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
Aniket Satish Amberkar
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
