Allowed

Mohamed Afsar Sayed S/O Mohamed Ayub v. Municipal Corpration of Greater Mumbai and Vaibhav Co-Operative Housing Society (Applicant)

Bombay HC10 Jan 2018CHSW/299/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting a chamber summons to add an applicant as a necessary party to a writ petition concerning an amendment, fixing the matter for hearing before the full court while extending ad-interim relief.

What did the court decide?

Chamber summons made absolute; writ petition to be placed on High Court Bench.

What the court decided

Mohamed Afsar Sayed S/O Mohamed Ayub Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2018)

chsw299

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶6

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.299 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2582 OF 2017

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.Sanjiv P. Kadam for the Applicant
Mr.Rajesh Dixit i/b Mr.V.R.Tripathi for the petitioner
Ms Kejali Mastakar for the Respondent-MMC.

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
P.N.DESHMUKH,JJ.
 DATE : JANUARY 10, 2018

¶10

P.C.

¶11

1 In view of the averments made in
the paragraph 2 of the affidavit in
support of the Chamber Summons, the
applicant is at least a necessary
party. Accordingly, the Chamber Summons
is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (b).

¶12

2The petitioner in the Writ Petition
No.2582 of 2017 to carry out
consequential amendment within a period
of one week from the date on which this
order is uploaded.

¶13

2 chsw299

¶14

3Place the Writ Petition High Upon
Board on 22nd January 2018. Ad-interim
relief granted on 7th September 2017
will continue to operate till then.

¶15

(P.N.DESHMUKH,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)

Mohamed Afsar Sayed S/O Mohamed Ayub v. Municipal Corpration of Greater Mumbai and Vaibhav Co-Operative Housing Society (Applicant)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mohamed Afsar Sayed S/O Mohamed Ayub v. Municipal Corpration of Greater Mumbai and Vaibhav Co-Operative Housing Society (Applicant)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Vinod Dadu Chougale and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Anr.

Abdul Sattar Shaikh and Ors. Vs the Commissioner, Solapur Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Siraj Ahmed Abdul Rehman Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.

M/S Sheen Ads and Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Mr. Ramji Wagha Dabhi Alias Kathiawadi and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader and Ors.

Atc Telecom Infrastructure .P. Ltd. Vs Mumbai Municipal Corporation and 5 Ors.