Petitioners stated that the Contempt Petition ceased to have any cause due to subsequent developments. The court disposed of the petition accordingly.
Disposed as there was nothing to survive in the Contempt Petition in view of subsequent developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 46 OF 2016
Vikas Shikshan Sanstha and anr. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar, for the Petitioners. Mr.S.B.Kalel, AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 4 - State.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 24th AUGUST 2018
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for petitioners states that in view of
the subsequent development, nothing survives in the Contempt
Petition and the same is disposed of as such.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.)
1/1
Vikas Shikshan Sanstha
The State of Maharashtra
B.R.GAVAI
M.S.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
