Balkrishna Shivram More and 43 Others v. State of Maharashtra and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay held that since the applicants were not eligible for alternate permanent accommodation due to their names not being recorded, modification of the order dated 11th June 2018 was unjustified. The Notice of Motion was dismissed, but six weeks' time was granted for compliance.
What did the court decide?
Notice of Motion dismissed. Applicants granted six weeks to comply with the order dated 11th June 2018.