In an uncontested motion for condonation of delay in filing a Central Excise appeal, the court perused the affidavit of the learned Assistant Commissioner and allowed the motion on satisfaction with the reasons indicated.
Motion for condonation of 88 days delay in filing the accompanying appeal is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
336-18-NMA-14=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 336 OF 2018 IN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 54 OF 2018
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Raigad Commissionerate .. Applicant
In the matter between The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Raigad Commissionerate .. Appellant
v/s.
Dorf Ketal Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr. J.B. Mishra a/w Mr. Sham Walve for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.
DATED : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2018.
P.C.
Digitally signed by Uday Shivaji Uday Jagtap Date: Shivaji 2018.09.18 11:19:47 Jagtap +0530
1 of 2
336-18-NMA-14=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
Jitendra Singh, Assistant Commissioner of CGST & CE, Division VI, Raigad Commissionerate in support of the motion. We are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Raigad Commissionerate
Dorf Ketal Pvt. Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
