The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Family Court Appeal No.25 of 2018 was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear and failed to file requisite documents by the stipulated date.
Family Court Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of appellant and non-filing of private paper book.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26 fca25-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.25 OF 2018
Ratan Rajaram Dolle .. Appellant V/s. Sunita Ratan Dolle .. Respondent
None for the appellant
Mr.V.N.Tayade for the respondent no.1
CORAM: K.K. TATED & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED : JULY 24, 2018
P.C. :
2 Office note shows that advocate for the appellant failed to file private paper book as per order dated 25.01.2018.
3 As no one appeared on behalf of appellant, Family Court Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) ( K.K. TATED, J. )
Mohite
1/1
Digitally signed Trusha by Trusha Tushar Mohite Tushar Date: 2018.07.27 Mohite 12:29:54+0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court Appeal should be maintained in the absence of the appellant.
Ratan Rajaram Dolle
Sunita Ratan Dolle
K.K. TATED
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
