Petitioners prayed to withdraw the Contempt Petition with liberty to file appropriate petition. The court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Contempt petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.cp.285.2018.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2018
Prakash Tukaram Mutke & Anr.
...Petitioners.
vs
Manu Tukaram Shrivastav, the Secretary & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr R.S.Apte Sr.Counsel i/b Lengare Y.B. for the Petitioners.
Digitally signed Dhanappa by Dhanappa CORAM : K.K.TATED, & Irappa Koshti Irappa Date: B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ. Koshti 2018.07.24 17:08:50 +0530 JULY 23, 2018.
P.C. :
Heard Mr Apte, learned senior counsel for the
petitioners.
2 After arguing for sometime, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the present Contempt Petition with liberty to file appropriate petition. He submits that he has made this statement after taking instructions from his client, who is present in the court today. To that effect, learned senior counsel has given the same in writing, the same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The same is accepted. 3 The Contempt Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) ( K.K.TATED, J.)
Pg 1 of 1
Prakash Tukaram Mutke
Manu Tukaram Shrivastav
K.K. Tated
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
