shri rohidas bhagirat bhati v. pune municipal corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant's counsel submitted that papers were returned. The appeal was dismissed for lack of appearance by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.fa.2183.2005.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2183 OF 2005
Rohidas Bhagirat Bhati
...Appellant
vs
Pune Municipal Corporation Pune ...Respondent.
Mr Ranjit Shinde I/b S.B.Deshmukh for the Appellant.
Dhanappa Irappa Koshti
Digitally signed by Dhanappa Irappa Koshti CORAM : K.K.TATED, & Date: 2018.07.25 B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ. 13:55:52 +0530 JULY 23, 2018.
P.C. :
Mr Shinde, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he already returned all the papers to the appellant on 1st May, 2006.
2 As no one appeared on behalf of the appellant, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) ( K.K.TATED, J.)
Pg 1 of 1
Rohidas Bhagirat Bhati
Pune Municipal Corporation
K.K. Tatsumi
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court