Allowed

Mr. Chandrasekhar Basalingappa Barbade and Ors. v. the Competent Authority and Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Office No. 11 and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Jul 2018CAW/1524/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two-judge bench restored original Writ Petitions to file on merits and extended the time to remove office objections until July 27, 2018, based on applicants' submissions.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petitions restored to file; time for removing office objections extended to July 27, 2018.

What the court decided

Mr. Chandrasekhar Basalingappa Barbade and Ors. Vs the… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

902.1524.18-caw+.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1524/2018

¶3

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.6870/2018

¶5

Chandrashekhar Basalingappa Barbade & Ors. … Applicants V/s.

¶6

The Competent Authority and Dy. Collector, Land Acquisition Office NO.11 & Ors.

¶7

… Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1526/2018 IN

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO.6871/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1527/2018

¶11

IN WRIT PETITION NO.6872/2018

¶12

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1529/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6873/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1530/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6894/2018

¶13

Dr. Ramdas P. Sabban for the Applicant in Civil Application Nos.1524/2018, 1526/2018, 1530/2018 Dr. Ramdas P. Sabban with Mr. Subhash V. Gutte for the Applicant in Civil Application Nos.1527/2018 and 1529/2018 Mrs. Shivani S. Samel for Respondent Nos.4B, 4C, 4D, 4E. Mrs. Madhubala Kajale, “B” Panel Counsel for the Respondent State in Civil Application Nos.1524/2018, 1527/2018, 1530/2018 Mrs. Pushpalata N. Diwan, AGP for the Respondent State in Civil Application Nos.1526/2018 and 1529/2018

¶14

Basavraj G. Patil

¶15

1/2

¶16

Digitally signed by Basavraj Basavraj Gurappa Patil Gurappa Date: Patil 2018.07.24 11:45:07 +0530

¶17

902.1524.18-caw+.doc

¶18

CORAM: K.K. TATED & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

¶19

DATED : JULY 20, 2018

¶20

P.C. :

¶21

1 Heard. These Applications are made by the original Petitioner for restoration of the Writ Petitions which stood dismissed in view of conditional order dated 27.06.2018 passed by this court for non removal of office objections.

¶22

2 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicants and the reasons disclosed in paragraph 3 of the Civil Applications, we are satisfied that the Applicants have made out a case for allowing the Civil Applications.

¶23

3 Hence, following order is passed:

¶24

a. The Writ Petitions stand restored to file on merits.

¶25

b. Time to remove all office objections as per conditional order dated 27.06.2018 is extended till 27.07.2018.

¶26

c. The Applicant is directed to remove all office objections on or before 27.07.2018.

¶27

d. The Applicant to inform the other side about restoration of the Writ Petitions.

¶28

e. Civil applications stand disposed off accordingly.

¶29

(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.)

¶30

( K.K. TATED, J. )

¶31

Basavraj G. Patil

Mr. Chandrasekhar Basalingappa Barbade and Ors. v. the Competent Authority and Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Office No. 11 and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mr. Chandrasekhar Basalingappa Barbade and Ors. v. the Competent Authority and Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Office No. 11 and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Priya Atul Gonel Vs Mr. Atul Arun Gonel

Mr. Manoj Mahadev Vishwakarma Vs Mrs. Sushma Manoj Vishwakarma

Mrs. Surekha Namdeo Dhapte Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mrs. Swati Sujit Nadkarni Vs Mr. Sujit Surendra Nadkarni

Anuradha @ Anita Mahendra Chavan Vs Mahendra Uddhavrao Chavan

Anuradha @ Anita Mahendra Chavan Vs Mahendra Uddhavrao Chavan