The court disposed of a contempt petition where the petitioner surrendered possession of a shop via a registered transfer deed, deemed as substantial compliance with a prior order, rendering contempt action unnecessary.
The contempt petition was disposed of without initiating action against the contemnor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CPST. 32722-16.doc
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (St.) No. 32722 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION No. 12056 OF 2015
Gulraj Shewakram Madnani … Petitioner Vs.
Rajendra Nimbalkar, Commissioner & Ors. … Respondents
Ms. Minal Chandnani i/b J. S. Chandnani, for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh M. Kamble, for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Ms. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 19, 2018
PC :
has been already placed in possession of Shop No. 1. Thus, there is
1 / 2
CPST. 32722-16.doc
substantial compliance of order 14th September, 2016 in Writ Petition No. 12056 of 2015. Under the circumstances, it is not necessary to initiate action against the contemnor under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/Sd/[P. N. DESHMUKH, J.] [A. S. OKA, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether substantial compliance with the impugned order renders initiation of contempt proceedings unnecessary.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gulraj Shewakram Madnani
Rajendra Nimbalkar
A. S. OKA
P. N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
