Kothari Medical v. Pimpri Chichwad Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN
1/1 4905.16-wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4905 OF 2016
Kothari Medical. … Petitioner. V/s. Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and another. … Respondents.
Mr.Anurag Jain for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak R. More for the respondents. Mr.K.S.Bapat for the intervener.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has placed on record a copy of the order dated 25th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of the first respondent- Municipal Corporation and a copy of the communication dated 18th October 2017 issued by the Health Officer of the first respondent to M/s.Maheshwari Sales Corporation. 2. In view of what is stated in both the documents, prayer clause (a), which is the only substantive prayer, does not survive. 3. If what is set out in the amendment application filed by the petitioner gives any new cause of action, the petitioner can always file a fresh petition.
(P.N.DESHMUKH, J.)
(A.S.OKA, J.)
Kothari Medical
Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation
P.N.DESHMUKH
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court