Disposed

Abasaheb Parasram Late and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC5 Sept 2018CP/453/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a contempt petition regarding an alleged breach of an order dated 16.11.2017 directing land acquisition proceedings, this court noted that the proceedings were initiated and the respondent filed an unconditional apology for the delay. The court held that the grievance was redressed and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was disposed of on the basis that the grievance was redressed due to initiation of proceedings and acceptance of apology.

Abasaheb Parasram Late and Another Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

Contempt Petition No.453/2018

¶2

(( 1 ))

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.453 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8001 OF 2016

¶5

Abasaheb s/o Parasram Late & anr. ... PETITIONERS

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS

¶8

Shri S.B. Choudhari, Advocate for petitioners Shri G.O. Wattamwar, A.G.P. for State

¶9

CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.

¶10

DATED : 5th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

¶11

ORAL ORDER :

¶12

Heard learned counsel Mr. Choudhari for the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners was of noncompliance of the order of this Court, dated 16.11.2017. The respondents were directed to initiate proceedings under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

¶13

The notice was issued on 2.7.2018. In response to the notice, affidavit-in-reply on behalf of respondent No.1 M. Devender Singh, Collector, Beed is filed. It is stated in the reply

¶14

Contempt Petition No.453/2018 (( 2 ))

¶15

at para No.6 that, the land acquisition proceeding has been initiated by issuing preliminary notification under Section 11 of the Act of 2013 and published in Government Gazette dated 12th to 18th July 2018. A copy of the gazette is also annexed to the affidavit-in-reply. The learned A.G.P. submits that, within the stipulated period under the Act, the further progress would be completed. The deponent Mr. M. Devender Singh also tenders his unconditional apology for the delay. We accept the unconditional apology tendered by the deponent Mr. M. Devender Singh.

¶16

Considering the fact that now the proceeding is initiated and statement is made before this Court that the authority would complete the process within the stipulated period under the provisions of the Act of 2013, the order of this Court dated 16.11.2017 is now complied with and the grievance of the petitioners is redressed, nothing remains in the contempt Petition.

¶17

Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶18

(MANISH PITALE) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE

¶19

fmp/-

Abasaheb Parasram Late and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abasaheb Parasram Late and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahyadri Bahujan Vidya Prasarak Samaj through Its Registrar Vs Nandkumar and Others

Shashank Shivajirao Chimanshette Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Malikarjun Ramrao Rodge Vs Rajesh Jaising Gole and Others

Dadu Sudam Patekar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dipak Gangadharrao Sul and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Geetanjali Pandurang Mule Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others