The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Contempt Petition No. 56 of 2018 upon receiving oral instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the petition, citing unwillingness to prosecute the matter.
Petition disposed of on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
56.18cp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 56 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13692 OF 2017
Sahyadri Bahujan Vidya Prasarak
Samaj Through its Registrar
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
Nandkumar & ors..RESPONDENTS
Mr S.S. Wagh, Advocate h/f Mr S.T. Shelke, Advocate
for petitioner;
Mr G.O. Wattamwar, A.G.P. for respondent/State;
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & MANISH PITALE,JJ.
DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2018
ORAL ORDER :
Learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner orally
requested the Counsel to pray for withdrawal of the
petition. In view of oral instructions, learned
Counsel prays for withdrawal of the petition.
56.18cp (2)
2.The petition is disposed of in view of
unwillingness expressed by the petitioner to
prosecute the petition.
(MANISH PITALE)(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Tupe
Digitally signed by S.U. S.U. Tupe Date: 2018.09.05 Tupe 11:05:00 +0530
Sahyadri Bahujan Vidya Prasarak Samaj Through its Registrar
Nandkumar & ors.
Prasanna B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court