The petitioner contended that there was some delay in receiving monetary benefits which he has now received. On the plain ground of this communication, this Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the contempt petition and accordingly disposed of it.
Contempt petition is withdrawn and accordingly disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
264.16cp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 264 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4132 OF 2002
Mallikarjun s/o Ramrao Rodge,
Age: 58 years, Occ: Retired,
R/o. Devarjan, Tq. Udgir,
Dist. Latur...PETITIONER
VERSUS
1.Rajesh s/o Jaising Gole,
Age: 38 years, Occ: Service,
and Secretary Jagruti Shikshan
Prasarak Mandal, Pedli,
Tq. Sudhagad, Dist. Raigad.
2.Bhimrao s/o Jagannath Janrao,
Age : 45 years, Occ: Service as
Head Master, Saraswati Vidya
Mandir, Amtem, Tq. Pen,
Dist. Raigad.
3.Shesrao Bade,
Age: 43 years, Occ: Service as
Education Officer (Secondary)
Zilla Parishad, Alibag,
Dist. Raigad...RESPONDENTS
Mr P.G. Rodge, Advocate for the petitioner;
Mr S.R. Choukidar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1
and 2;
Mr D.R. Kale, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
MANISH PITALE,JJ.
DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2018
(2)
264.16cp
ORAL ORDER :
Mr. Rodge, learned Counsel appearing for
the petitioner, on receiving copy of written
communication dated 28th August, 2018, prays for
withdrawal of the petition. It is stated in the
communication that the petitioner received certain
monetary benefits though belatedly and the
petitioner by keeping option open to approach the
competent forum for redressal of his grievance and
delay caused in receiving monetary benefits, the
petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present
contempt petition. The communication is taken on
record and marked 'X' for identification.
2.In view of communication, learned Counsel
is permitted to withdraw the petition. The petition
is accordingly disposed of.
(MANISH PITALE)(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Tupe
Mallikarjun s/o Ramrao Rodge
Rajesh s/o Jaising Gole
Bhimrao s/o Jagannath Janrao
Shesrao Bade
Prashanna B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court