Kiran Bhausaheb Tapale v. Nitin Karir and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a contempt petition as withdrawn upon the motion of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Prod-1-cp-306-2016
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1 CONT. PETITION NO. 306 OF 2016
IN WP/8108/2014
KIRAN BHAUSAHEB TAPALE
VERSUS
NITIN KARIR AND ANOTHER
Mr. Parag Vijay Barde, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2018.
PER COURT:-
1.Motion is made for withdrawal of the
contempt petition.
2.In view of the request made by the
petitioner, contempt petition is disposed of as
withdrawn. No costs.
(S. M. GAVHANE) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/September-18
Digitally signed Devendra by Devendra Nandkumar Kale Nandkumar Date: Kale 2018.09.19 11:27:09 +0530
KIRAN BHAUSAHEB TAPALE
NITIN KARIR
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
S. M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court