This PIL petition regarding encroachment was disposed of after the court accepted the respondent Grampanchayat's undertaking to remove encroachments within two months.
The respondent Grampanchayat ordered to remove encroachment within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) pil 60.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 60 OF 2014
Ankush Ramchandra Chame .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri. Ajinkya Reddy, Advocate for Petitioner. Smt. M. A. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Shri. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Shri. S. V. Mundhe, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 7 and 8.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : 12th September, 2018
PER COURT:
. We have heard Mr. Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Government Pleader, Mr. Bonder and Mr. Mundhe, the learned counsel for the respondents.
submits that the Grampanchayat has already issued notices to the encroacher's on 01st August, 2018. The Grampanchayat would take effective steps to remove the same within two months from today.
[ S. M. GAVHANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
ass/pil 60.14
Ankush Ramchandra Chame
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
