Disposed

Namdeo Bhagaji Kharat v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC19 Oct 2018CP/276/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition concerning non-compliance of a writ order regarding the petitioner's pension, the respondents placed proof of order compliance on record. The petitioner admitted the grievance was redressed. The court held that nothing survived and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition disposed of as the grievance was admitted to be redressed.

Namdeo Bhagaji Kharat Vs State of Maharashtra and Others — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

276.18cp

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITIOIN NO. 276 OF 2018 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.2026 OF 2015

¶6

Namdeo s/o Bhagaji Kharat,
Age: 67 years, Occ: Pensioner,
R/o. At post Borgaon (Arj)
Tq. Phulambri, Dist. Aurangabad...PETITIONER

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

1. Shri. Dineshkumar Jain, Additional Chief Secretary, (Finance) Department, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

¶9

2. Shri. Nandkumar, The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

¶10

3. Accountant General ( A & E )-II, Maharashtra, Nagpur, Dist. Nagpur.

¶11

4. Shri. Gajanan Sukhdeo Susar, Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. ..RESPONDENTS

¶12

Mr V.G. Salgare, Advocate for petitioner;
Mr G.O. Wattamwar, A.G.P. for respondent/State;

¶13

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
 MANISH PITALE,JJ.

¶14

 DATE : 19th OCTOBER, 2018

(2)

276.18cp

ORAL ORDER :

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioner.

¶19

2.The petition was filed with a grievance of
non compliance of the order of this Court dated
23rd February, 2015 in Writ Petition No. 2026 of
2015.

¶20

3. Learned A.G.P. placed on record the

¶21

communication dated 4th October, 2018 along with
the copy of the order. It is stated in the
communication that the pension of the petitioner
has been revised and the revised Pension Payment
Authority was issued by this respondent on 2nd May,
2018 in compliance with the order dated 23rd
February, 2015. The copy of the necessary order
issued from the office of the Accountant General,
Maharashtra (Accounts & Entitlement)-II, Nagpur is
also placed on record.

¶22

4.Learned Counsel appearing for the

¶23

petitioner fairly admits that the grievance of the

¶24

276.18cp (3)

¶25

petitioner is redressed.

¶26

5.In view of this fact, nothing survives in
the contempt petition. The contempt petition is
accordingly disposed of.

¶27

(MANISH PITALE)(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGE JUDGE

¶28

Tupe

¶29

Digitally signed by S.U. Tupe S.U. Date: 2018.10.22 18:03:06 +0530 Tupe

Namdeo Bhagaji Kharat v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Namdeo Bhagaji Kharat v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adiwasi Chetna Parishad Thorough Chairman Shridhar Khandu Salunke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sunil Vishwanath Jadhav and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association through Its President S P Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shrigonda Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Union Shramik Ahmednagar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Ratan Anandrao Suradkar

Somnath Rajaram Ahire Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others