Allowed

Shrigonda Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Union Shramik Ahmednagar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC19 Oct 2018CA/3757/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge court allowed application by applicants to amend writ petition, adding M.I.D.C. and Group Grampanchayat as respondents with consequential grounds.

What did the court decide?

Application to add parties and grounds allowed; amendment required within one week; notice to new respondents to be issued returnable in six weeks.

Shrigonda Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Union Shramik… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

3757.18ca

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3757 OF 2018 IN/WITH

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.12416 OF 2017

¶6

Shridonda Taluka Sakhar Kamgar
Union Shramik, Tilak Road,
Ahmednagar & ors

¶7

..APPLICANTS

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

The State of Maharashtra & ors

¶10

..RESPONDENTS

¶11

Mr Satyajeet S. Dixit, Advocate for applicants;
Mr G.O. Wattamwar, A.G.P. for respondent/State

¶12

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & MANISH PITALE,JJ.

¶13

 DATE : 19th OCTOBER, 2018

¶14

ORAL ORDER :

¶15

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the
applicants/petitioners.

¶16

2.Learned Counsel appearing for the

¶17

applicants/petitioners invited our attention to the

¶18

documents placed on record to submit that
subsequent of filing the petition, certain events
occurred. He then submits that in view of these

¶19

events, the applicants/petitioners will have to add

¶20

3757.18ca (2)

¶21

grounds and also consequential prayers in the
petition.

¶22

3.The prayer for adding parties namely
respondent No.5 Maharashtra Industrial Development
Corporation, Mumbai, M.I.D.C. Office, Mumbai
Through its Chief Executive Officer and respondent
No.6 Group Grampanchayat, Puntamba, Tq. Rahata,
Dist. Ahmednagar Through its Gram Sevak as well as
prayer for adding grounds and consequential prayers
causes no prejudice to the respondents. As such,
the application is allowed.

¶23

4.Necessary amendment be carried out within
one week from today. On carrying amendment within
one week, issue notice to respondent Nos. 5 and 6
in Writ Petition, making the same returnable after
six weeks.

¶24

(MANISH PITALE) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE

¶25

Tupe

Shrigonda Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Union Shramik Ahmednagar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shrigonda Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Union Shramik Ahmednagar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adiwasi Chetna Parishad Thorough Chairman Shridhar Khandu Salunke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sunil Vishwanath Jadhav and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association through Its President S P Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Namdeo Bhagaji Kharat Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Ratan Anandrao Suradkar

Somnath Rajaram Ahire Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others