This court allowed a civil application to recall a prior order, thereby restoring an underlying writ petition for consideration. The application was disposed of by this oral order.
Recall of order dated 21.07.2017; restoration of the writ petition for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1} 901-CA-12078-18...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12078 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8118 OF 2017
Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association, Nanded
...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. J.V. Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for Applicant Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for Respondent/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATE: 17th OCTOBER, 2018
ORAL ORDER :
( MANISH PITALE ) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE ) JUDGE JUDGE
mta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the civil application to restore the underlying writ petition.
Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association, Nanded
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
