In a contempt petition, the Court held that a fresh order granted approval to the petitioner, purging the contempt. The Court remanded a proposal for continuation of service to the Education Officer for consideration on merits.
Contempt petition disposed of; proposal for continuation directed to be considered on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
91 CONT. PETITION NO. 689 OF 2017
IN WP/1948/2017
ROHIDAS BABASAHEB WAGHMARE
VERSUS
NANDKUMAR AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Dighe Vithal H.
AGP for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. V.S.Badakh
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 6, 2018
O R D E R :
Mr. Badakh, learned AGP submits that fresh order
has been passed on 27.7.2018 granting approval to the
petitioner from the date he has joined the said post. In
view of that the contempt stands purged.
2. The contempt petition is disposed of.
3.It is submitted that the Management has submitted
proposal for continuation of the petitioner after the
period of three years from the date of the appointment of
the petitioner.
2 cp689.17
4. The Education Officer shall consider the said
proposal on its won merits.
5. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. No costs.
mahajansb/
ROHIDAS BABASAHEB WAGHMARE
NANDKUMAR
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
SUNIL K.KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court